Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.6 | 90.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android |
| -- | 2019-09-04 |
| -- | 6.49 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| -- | 7.27 ounces |
| -- | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 800.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 416 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.54 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A90 5G has an overall score of 90.5, which is just a bit better than the Galaxy S25's overall score of 82.6. Galaxy A90 5G has Android OS, and Galaxy S25 has Android 14 OS. Galaxy A90 5G features a lot better processing power than Samsung Galaxy S25, although it has less RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
The Samsung Galaxy S25 features a better screen than Galaxy A90 5G, because although it has a quite smaller display and a little bit worse 1080 x 2340 resolution, it also counts with a quite higher pixel density. The Samsung Galaxy S25 has a slightly better camera than Samsung Galaxy A90 5G, because it has a much higher 7680x4320 video resolution, a way bigger back-facing camera sensor providing a way better image quality, a camera in the back with a higher resolution and a bigger diafragm aperture.
The Galaxy A90 5G features a much bigger memory capacity for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy S25, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal memory, the Galaxy A90 5G also has a slot for external memory cards that admits a maximum of 512 GB. Galaxy A90 5G has a bit superior battery performance than Galaxy S25, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.