Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.6 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| -- | 2017-02-24 |
| -- | 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches |
| -- | 6.63 ounces |
| -- | Black and Gold |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 800.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 416 pixels per inch | 367 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 7.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 510 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.54 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S25 is slightly better than the Galaxy C9 Pro, getting a overall score of 82.6 against 81. These devices include Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy S25 has 14 version and Galaxy C9 Pro has Android 6.0 Marshmallow. Galaxy S25 is a noticeably lighter and thinner phone than the Galaxy C9 Pro.
The Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro features a much powerful processing unit than Galaxy S25, although it has less RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. Samsung Galaxy S25 features a lot better display than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a little bigger display, a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2340 and a just a bit more pixels per inch of display.
The Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro has a slightly bigger storage for games and applications than Galaxy S25, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with an external memory slot that admits a maximum of 256 GB. Samsung Galaxy S25 counts with a much better camera than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a way better video resolution, a much higher resolution back facing camera and a bigger aperture to take better low light images and videos.
Galaxy C9 Pro counts with a battery performance that's just as good as Galaxy S25's battery performance.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.