Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.6 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| Android 14 | Android 14 |
| -- | 2024-04-03 |
| -- | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| -- | 7.73 ounces |
| -- | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 800.00 | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 416 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 6.21 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 12.54 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S25 is a little bit better than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, with an 82.6 score against 77.8. Both of these phones use the same Android 14 OS (operating system), so they should offer the same operating system features. The Galaxy S25 is a lighter and a lot thinner phone than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a bit better looking screen than Galaxy S25, because although it has a little bit lower screen density, it also counts with a bigger screen, a much brighter display and a way better 2200 x 2480 resolution.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a little faster processor than Galaxy S25, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the vivo X Fold 3 Pro also has a greater amount of RAM memory. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a way bigger memory for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy S25, because it has 512 GB internal storage.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro takes a little bit better pictures and videos than Galaxy S25, and although they both have the same video resolution, the same 30 fps video frame rates and a same resolution camera in the back, the vivo X Fold 3 Pro also has a bigger camera sensor providing a higher image quality and a bigger aperture to capture better photos in low-light situations.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a superior battery lifetime than Galaxy S25, because it has 5700mAh of battery capacity.
The Galaxy S25 is not only the best phones of the ones in this comparison, but it's also a bargain compared to others, making this phone an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.