Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.6 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| Android 14 | Android 11 |
| -- | 2021-04-02 |
| -- | 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches |
| -- | 6.31 ounces |
| -- | Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 800.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 416 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.54 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 6.08 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S25 has a score of 82.6, which is just a bit better than vivo X60 Pro's score of 78.8. Galaxy S25 is a much thinner and notably lighter cellphone than vivo X60 Pro. Both phones in this review use Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy S25 has a newer 14 version while vivo X60 Pro has Android 11, so it counts with a couple additional features.
Vivo X60 Pro has a really superior performance than Samsung Galaxy S25, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the vivo X60 Pro also has 4 GB more RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy S25 counts with a sharper display than vivo X60 Pro, because although it has a little bit smaller display and a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2340px, it also counts with a little bit more pixels per screen inch.
The Samsung Galaxy S25 has a bit better camera than vivo X60 Pro, and although they both have a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the Samsung Galaxy S25 also has a lot larger sensor, a lot better 7680x4320 video definition and a better resolution back facing camera. The vivo X60 Pro counts with a lot bigger storage to store more games and applications than Galaxy S25, because it has 128 GB more internal storage.
The vivo X60 Pro features a bit better battery duration than Galaxy S25, because it has a 5% greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.