Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.6 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 14 | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| -- | 2016-09-29 |
| -- | 5.73 x 2.77 x 0.32 inches |
| -- | 5.11 ounces |
| -- | Gold, Gray, Pink and Silver |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 800.00 | $ 345.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 416 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2340 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.54 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S25 is a bit better than Xiaomi Mi 5s, having a global score of 82.6 against 76.4. Both devices in this comparison have Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy S25 has the older 14 version and Xiaomi Mi 5s has Android 6.0 Marshmallow. Samsung Galaxy S25's design is noticeably thinner and a lot lighter than Xiaomi Mi 5s.
Xiaomi Mi 5s features a much better performing processing unit than Samsung Galaxy S25, although it has a lower amount of RAM and a lower number of cores. Samsung Galaxy S25 counts with a sharper display than Xiaomi Mi 5s, because although it has a just a little lower display pixels density, it also counts with a bigger display, much more brightness and a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels.
Xiaomi Mi 5s's storage capacity to install games and applications is just as good as the Samsung Galaxy S25 one, they have equal internal storage capacity. Galaxy S25 counts with a greater camera than Xiaomi Mi 5s, because it has a much higher video resolution, a bigger camera aperture to capture better low-light photography and videos, a lot bigger sensor taking lot better quality videos and pictures and a camera in the back with a lot better 50 MP resolution.
Galaxy S25 counts with better battery lifetime than Xiaomi Mi 5s, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Although Galaxy S25 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Xiaomi Mi 5s, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Xiaomi Mi 5s. If you want to save some money, you can get the Xiaomi Mi 5s, letting go a few features and specs, but you will get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.