Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.6 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 14 | -- |
| -- | 2018-08-29 |
| -- | 6.12 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| -- | 6.35 ounces |
| -- | Black, Blue and Red |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 800.00 | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2246 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 416 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| 2600 cd/m2 brightness | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 16.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.54 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has an overall score of 85.5, which is slightly better than Galaxy S25's 82.6 overall score. Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has a lot better processing power than Samsung Galaxy S25. Both of them have a 8 GB RAM and a Octa-Core CPU. Galaxy S25 has a better looking display than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, and although they both have a same size display, the Galaxy S25 also has a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2340, a little better pixel amount in each inch of display and much more brightness.
The Galaxy S25 counts with a greater camera than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because it has a lot higher video definition, a lot more megapixels back camera, a lot larger camera sensor which gives a much higher photo and video quality and a bigger camera aperture to take better images and videos in poorly lited situations.
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with much more storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S25, because it has 256 GB internal storage and a SD card slot that holds up to 256 GB. Xiaomi Pocophone F1's battery lifetime is very similar to Galaxy S25's battery duration.
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 not only is the best phones in our comparison, but it's also very cheap compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.