Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.3 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 4.4.2, 4.3, 4.2.2 | -- |
| 2013-03-14 | 2018-10-18 |
| 5.38 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| 4.59 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Red and White | Black, Pink and White |
| Polycarbonate | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 205.00 | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 600 APQ8064T chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Krait 300 (Quad-Core 1900 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 320 (400 MHz) GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.56 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 31.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Li-Ion Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 17 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.56 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3 is a bit better than the Galaxy S4, getting a general score of 80 against 77.3. Google Pixel 3 is a heavier cellphone than the Galaxy S4, but both are equally thin. The Galaxy S4 has a little more vivid screen than Google Pixel 3, because although it has a little bit smaller screen and a little lower 1920 x 1080 resolution, it also counts with a bit greater pixel quantity in each screen inch.
The Google Pixel 3 has slightly more storage capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S4, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 64 GB internal memory. Google Pixel 3 has a bit better CPU than Samsung Galaxy S4, because although it has doesn't have an additional GPU, it also counts with a greater number of cores and more RAM memory.
Google Pixel 3 counts with just a bit longer battery performance than Galaxy S4, because it has a 12 percent more battery size. The Google Pixel 3 captures slightly better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy S4, because although it has a back camera with a worse 12.2 megapixels resolution, it also counts with a lot better 3840x2160 video definition, a bigger aperture to take better photos in low light situations and a bigger camera sensor providing a better image quality.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones we are comparing here, the Google Pixel 3 is also very cheap compared to the other phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.