Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.3 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 4.4.2, 4.3, 4.2.2 | Android 10 |
| 2013-03-14 | 2018-10-18 |
| 5.38 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches | 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches |
| 4.59 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Red and White | Aurora black and Moroccan blue |
| Polycarbonate | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 205.00 | $ 204.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 600 APQ8064T chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Krait 300 (Quad-Core 1900 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 320 (400 MHz) GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.56 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 31.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 17 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.56 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The LG V40 ThinQ has a general score of 81.2, which is a bit better than Samsung Galaxy S4's 77.3 overall score. The LG V40 ThinQ design is much newer and just a little thinner, but also heavier than Samsung Galaxy S4. Both of these devices work with Android OS, but LG V40 ThinQ has the previous 10 version while Samsung Galaxy S4 has Android 4.4.2 version.
The LG V40 ThinQ counts with a bit faster processor than Samsung Galaxy S4, because although it has doesn't have a graphics processor, it also counts with more RAM memory and a larger number of cores. The Galaxy S4 features a bit better screen than LG V40 ThinQ, although it has a really smaller display, a just a bit less pixels per display inch and a way worse 1920 x 1080 resolution.
LG V40 ThinQ has a better camera than Galaxy S4, because although it has a camera in the back with less mega pixels resolution, it also counts with a lot higher (4K) video resolution, a lot bigger aperture and a bigger sensor which offers a higher image and video quality. The LG V40 ThinQ features a much better memory to install applications and games than Galaxy S4, because it has a slot for an SD memory card that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB and more internal storage.
The LG V40 ThinQ features better battery performance than Galaxy S4, because it has a 3300mAh battery capacity against 2600mAh.
LG V40 ThinQ not only is the best phones in our current comparison, but it's also the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.