Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.3 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 4.4.2, 4.3, 4.2.2 | -- |
| 2013-03-14 | 2019-03-15 |
| 5.38 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 4.59 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Red and White | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| Polycarbonate | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 205.00 | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 600 APQ8064T chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Krait 300 (Quad-Core 1900 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 320 (400 MHz) GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.56 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 31.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 17 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.56 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A50 is a little bit better than the Samsung Galaxy S4, having an 83.8 score against 77.3. Samsung Galaxy A50's body is way newer and just a little thinner than Samsung Galaxy S4's, although it is noticeably heavier. The Galaxy S4 features a brighter screen than Samsung Galaxy A50, because although it has a bit worse resolution of 1920 x 1080px and a way smaller display, it also counts with a just a little greater pixels density.
Galaxy A50 counts with just a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy S4, because although it has doesn't have a graphics processor, it also counts with a larger number of faster cores and a higher amount of RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy A50 has a way bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy S4, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity and an external memory slot that supports up to 512 GB.
The Galaxy A50 counts with a really longer battery duration than Galaxy S4, because it has a 54% bigger battery size. Samsung Galaxy A50 captures much better pictures and videos than Galaxy S4, and although they both have the same 1920x1080 video definition and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Samsung Galaxy A50 also has a lot more mega pixels back facing camera, a much larger camera aperture to capture better low light images and videos and a bigger back camera sensor capturing higher quality photos and videos.
Samsung Galaxy A50 not only is the best phones between the ones we are comparing here, but it's also cheaper than the other phone, which makes it a simple decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.