Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| Android 4.4.2 | Android 14 |
| -- | 2024-04-03 |
| 5.38 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 4.59 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Brown, Pink, Purple, Red and White | Black and White |
| $ 249.00 | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 8 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 600 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Quad-Core 1900 MHz processor | processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 8.73 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.56 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 7.92 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Li-Ion Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 17 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.56 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a score of 77.8, which is a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy S4 Value Edition's score of 72.2. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro body is way thinner but heavier than Samsung Galaxy S4 Value Edition. Both phones in this comparison include Android operating system, but vivo X Fold 3 Pro has the older 14 version and Samsung Galaxy S4 Value Edition has Android 4.4.2 version.
The Samsung Galaxy S4 Value Edition counts with a lot better hardware performance than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has a lower number of cores and a smaller amount of RAM. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a much better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy S4 Value Edition, because although it has a little bit less pixels per inch of display, it also counts with a really larger display and a way better 2200 x 2480px resolution.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a much bigger memory capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy S4 Value Edition, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory capacity. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a very superior battery performance than Galaxy S4 Value Edition, because it has a 5700mAh battery size.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a way better camera than Samsung Galaxy S4 Value Edition, because it has a way higher resolution back camera and a much higher 7680x4320 video definition.
Although vivo X Fold 3 Pro is a better device, it costs a lot more than Galaxy S4 Value Edition, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Galaxy S4 Value Edition. If you are trying to save some dollars, you can buy Galaxy S4 Value Edition, letting go some specs and features, but you will get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.