Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy S5
32 GBSM-G901F
| Global Score | |
| 80.8 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| Android 4.4.2 | Android 14 |
| 2014-06-23 | 2024-04-03 |
| 5.59 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gold, Red and White | Black and White |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 399.00 | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 8 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.45 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 2.10 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Li-Ion Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.8 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S5 is just a bit better than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, having a overall score of 80.8 against 77.8. Even though Galaxy S5 is extremely older and much thicker than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, it's body is still way lighter. Both devices in this comparison come with Android operating system, but the Galaxy S5 has 4.4.2 version while vivo X Fold 3 Pro has Android 14 version.
Galaxy S5 counts with a way better processing power than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, because although it has 13 GB less RAM memory and less processing cores (but faster), it also counts with a graphics processor. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a slightly better display than Samsung Galaxy S5, because although it has a lot lower display density, it also counts with a lot better resolution of 2200 x 2480px and a way bigger display.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a lot bigger storage capacity for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy S5, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with more internal storage. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a very superior battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S5, because it has a 104% bigger battery capacity.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a very superior camera than Galaxy S5, because it has a way higher 50 mega pixels resolution camera, a lot higher 7680x4320 video definition, a much bigger sensor capturing much higher quality videos and photos and a lot bigger camera aperture to take better photos and videos in low-light situations.
Despite of being the best phone in this comparison, Galaxy S5 is also by far the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.