Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 92.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 4.4.4, 4.4.2 | Android 12, 11 |
| 2014-06-23 | 2021-08-19 |
| 5.72 x 2.89 x 0.35 inches | 6.42 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Gray, Green and Red | Blue Vegan Leather, Iridescent White and Midnight Blue |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 199.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 432 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragonn 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.9 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 6.72 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.90 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.69 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.5 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 480 hours standby time 29 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 20 Pro has an overall score of 92.8, which is much better than Galaxy S5 Active's general score of 75.6. These phones include Android operating system, but the Motorola Edge 20 Pro has 12 version and Galaxy S5 Active has Android 4.4.4 version. Motorola Edge 20 Pro's design is a lot newer and thinner, but heavier than Galaxy S5 Active.
The Samsung Galaxy S5 Active has a better screen than Motorola Edge 20 Pro, because although it has a really smaller screen and a quite lower resolution of 1920 x 1080px, it also counts with a just a bit better quantity of pixels per screen inch. The Motorola Edge 20 Pro features a much greater storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy S5 Active, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory.
The Motorola Edge 20 Pro features a little better processing power than Galaxy S5 Active, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics co-processor, it also counts with a higher number of cores (and also faster) and more RAM. Motorola Edge 20 Pro counts with a much longer battery lifetime than Galaxy S5 Active, because it has a 61% larger battery capacity.
The Motorola Edge 20 Pro features a lot better camera than Samsung Galaxy S5 Active, because it has a much better video quality and a lot more mega-pixels camera in the back.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.