Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 80.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 4.4.4, 4.4.2 | Android 12 |
| 2014-06-23 | 2022-09-08 |
| 5.72 x 2.89 x 0.35 inches | 6.37 x 2.89 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 7.00 ounces |
| Gray, Green and Red | Interstellar Black and Starlight White |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 199.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 432 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1250 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 SM8475 (4 nm) chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | processor |
| 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 6.72 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 60.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 0.82 inches (1/1.22") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.69 | 14.96 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.5 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Li-Ion Battery | 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 480 hours standby time 29 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra has a general score of 80.9, which is just a bit better than the Galaxy S5 Active's 75.6 score. These phones use Android OS, but Motorola Edge 30 Ultra has 12 version while Galaxy S5 Active has Android 4.4.4 version. Although Motorola Edge 30 Ultra is somewhat heavier than Galaxy S5 Active, it's a bit thinner and also a lot newer.
The Samsung Galaxy S5 Active counts with a little bit better screen than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, because although it has a bit worse 1920 x 1080 resolution and a lot smaller display, it also counts with a little higher pixel amount in each screen inch. Motorola Edge 30 Ultra features much more memory capacity for applications and games than Galaxy S5 Active, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy S5 Active counts with a very superior hardware performance than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, because although it has lesser RAM, it also counts with an additional GPU and a greater number of cores. The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra counts with a very superior battery lifetime than Galaxy S5 Active, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 2800mAh.
The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra features a lot better camera than Samsung Galaxy S5 Active, because it has a way better 7680x4320 video quality and a way more mega pixels camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.