Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 4.4.4, 4.4.2 | Android 14 |
| 2014-06-23 | 2024-08-29 |
| 5.72 x 2.89 x 0.35 inches | 6.07 x 2.80 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Gray, Green and Red | Grisaille, Latte, Nautical Blue and Poinciana |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 199.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2760 x 1256 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 432 pixels per inch | 474 pixels per inch |
| -- | 3000 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | processor |
| 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 6.72 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 73.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 8.69 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.5 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4310mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 480 hours standby time 29 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Neo has an overall score of 81.9, which is a bit better than Samsung Galaxy S5 Active's 75.6 overall score. Even though Motorola Edge 50 Neo is just a bit heavier than Samsung Galaxy S5 Active, it's a little thinner and also much newer. Both devices we compare here come with Android OS (Operating System), but Motorola Edge 50 Neo has an older 14 version and Samsung Galaxy S5 Active has Android 4.4.4 version.
The Motorola Edge 50 Neo counts with a much better looking display than Samsung Galaxy S5 Active, because it has a better 1256 x 2760px resolution, a bigger display and a bit better pixels quantity per inch of screen. The Galaxy S5 Active counts with a way better hardware performance than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, because although it has lesser cpu cores and a lower amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a GPU.
The Motorola Edge 50 Neo takes greater pictures and videos than Galaxy S5 Active, and although they both have the same (4K) video definition and the same video frame rates, the Motorola Edge 50 Neo also has a camera in the back with much more megapixels. The Motorola Edge 50 Neo counts with a very superior storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy S5 Active, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 240 GB more internal storage.
Motorola Edge 50 Neo features a really longer battery performance than Galaxy S5 Active, because it has a 4310mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.