Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 4.4.4, 4.4.2 | Android 14 |
| 2014-06-23 | 2024-04-16 |
| 5.72 x 2.89 x 0.35 inches | 6.35 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Gray, Green and Red | Black Beauty, Luxe Lavender, Moonlight Pearl and Vanilla Cream |
| -- | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 199.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 432 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2000 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | processor |
| 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 6.72 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.40 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 8.69 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.5 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 480 hours standby time 29 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro has an overall score of 86.3, which is better than Samsung Galaxy S5 Active's 75.6 global score. Both phones in this comparison review include Android OS (operating system), but Motorola Edge 50 Pro has the previous 14 version and Samsung Galaxy S5 Active has Android 4.4.4. The Motorola Edge 50 Pro body is much newer and a little thinner than the Samsung Galaxy S5 Active's, although it's also just a little heavier.
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro counts with a bit more vivid display than Galaxy S5 Active, because although it has a little lower pixels quantity in each display inch, it also counts with a way larger screen and a little bit higher 1080 x 2400 resolution. Motorola Edge 50 Pro features a way bigger storage to install games and applications than Galaxy S5 Active, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory.
The Samsung Galaxy S5 Active features a really superior processing power than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, because although it has less RAM and an inferior number of cores , it also counts with an additional graphics co-processor. Motorola Edge 50 Pro counts with a really longer battery performance than Galaxy S5 Active, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Motorola Edge 50 Pro counts with a lot better camera than Samsung Galaxy S5 Active, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same video definition, the Motorola Edge 50 Pro also has a way more megapixels back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.