Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 4.4.4, 4.4.2 | Android 14 |
| 2014-06-23 | 2024-04-16 |
| 5.72 x 2.89 x 0.35 inches | 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Gray, Green and Red | Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) |
| -- | Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 199.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 432 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | processor |
| 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 6.72 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 8.69 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.5 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 480 hours standby time 29 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a score of 87.1, which is better than Samsung Galaxy S5 Active's 75.6 global score. Both of these phones come with Android OS, but the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has the previous 14 version while Samsung Galaxy S5 Active has Android 4.4.4. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is a incredibly newer and a little bit thinner phone than the Samsung Galaxy S5 Active, but it is also somewhat heavier.
Galaxy S5 Active features a way better hardware performance than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, because although it has a lower amount of RAM and less CPU cores (although they are faster), it also counts with an extra graphics processing unit. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a bit sharper screen than Galaxy S5 Active, because although it has a just a little inferior amount of pixels per inch of display, it also counts with a really larger screen and a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra takes a lot better videos and photos than Galaxy S5 Active, and although they both have the same (4K) video definition, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also has a camera in the back with a much higher resolution and better 60 frames per second video frame rates. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a much better storage to store more apps and games than Galaxy S5 Active, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with more internal memory capacity.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a superior battery lifetime than Galaxy S5 Active, because it has a 61% larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.