Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 82.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 4.4.4, 4.4.2 | -- |
| 2014-06-23 | 2020-07-08 |
| 5.72 x 2.89 x 0.35 inches | 6.61 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Gray, Green and Red | Surfing blue |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 199.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | LCD |
| 432 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 6.72 | 12.98 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.69 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.5 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Li-Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 480 hours standby time 29 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Moto G 5G Plus has a general score of 82.6, which is slightly better than Samsung Galaxy S5 Active's 75.6 score. The Moto G 5G Plus is a somewhat heavier cellphone than Samsung Galaxy S5 Active, but they are 0.35inches thick. Galaxy S5 Active counts with a sharper screen than Moto G 5G Plus, because although it has a little bit lower resolution of 1920 x 1080 pixels and a way smaller screen, it also counts with a little greater pixels density.
Samsung Galaxy S5 Active counts with a little better performance than Moto G 5G Plus, because although it has 2 GB lesser RAM memory and 4 less processing cores , it also counts with an extra GPU. The Moto G 5G Plus counts with a much bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy S5 Active, because it has 48 GB more internal memory and an external memory card slot that holds a maximum of 1000 GB.
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus shoots greater photos and videos than Galaxy S5 Active, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Motorola Moto G 5G Plus also has a camera in the back with a way higher 48 mega pixels resolution. The Motorola Moto G 5G Plus has a superior battery performance than Galaxy S5 Active, because it has a 79 percent bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.