Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 4.4.4, 4.4.2 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2014-06-23 | 2020-04-16 |
| 5.72 x 2.89 x 0.35 inches | 6.29 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Gray, Green and Red | Smoke black |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 199.00 | $ 150.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 432 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 6.72 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.69 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Li-Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 480 hours standby time 29 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola Moto G Power is just a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy S5 Active, having a 76.1 score against 75.6. Motorola Moto G Power is a incredibly newer phone than the Samsung Galaxy S5 Active, although it is a little bit thicker and somewhat heavier. Both of these phones come with Android OS, but Motorola Moto G Power has older 11 version while Samsung Galaxy S5 Active has Android 4.4.4 version.
The Samsung Galaxy S5 Active features a little better hardware performance than Motorola Moto G Power, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory and a lower number of cores , it also counts with a graphics processing unit. The Galaxy S5 Active counts with a sharper screen than Motorola Moto G Power, because although it has a little bit lower resolution of 1920 x 1080px and a much smaller display, it also counts with a little higher pixels number in each inch in the screen.
The Motorola Moto G Power has a superior camera than Samsung Galaxy S5 Active. They have a camera with a 16 MP resolution, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same 30 fps video frame rate. The Motorola Moto G Power features a very superior storage to store more apps and games than Galaxy S5 Active, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that allows up to 512 GB and 48 GB more internal memory capacity.
Motorola Moto G Power features a really longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S5 Active, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 2800mAh.
Despite of being the best phone in our comparison, Moto G Power is also a bargain compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.