Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 84.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 4.4.4, 4.4.2 | -- |
| 2014-06-23 | 2020-09-18 |
| 5.72 x 2.89 x 0.35 inches | 6.61 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Gray, Green and Red | Oxford blue |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 199.00 | $ 398.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | LCD |
| 432 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 6.72 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.69 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.5 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Li-Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 480 hours standby time 29 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola One 5G is much better than the Galaxy S5 Active, having a overall score of 84.6 against 75.6. Motorola One 5G is a somewhat heavier cellphone than Galaxy S5 Active, but both are equally thin. The Galaxy S5 Active has just a bit better processing power than Motorola One 5G, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory and 4 lesser cores (although faster), it also counts with an additional graphics processor.
The Samsung Galaxy S5 Active has a much better display than Motorola One 5G, because although it has a lot smaller screen and a little worse resolution of 1920 x 1080px, it also counts with a just a bit greater pixel density. Motorola One 5G counts with a much better storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy S5 Active, because it has a SD card slot that supports a maximum of 1000 GB and more internal memory capacity.
The Motorola One 5G captures a lot better photographs and videos than Galaxy S5 Active, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same video frame rate, the Motorola One 5G also has a lot more mega-pixels camera in the back. Motorola One 5G has a much longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy S5 Active, because it has a 79 percent greater battery capacity.
Although Motorola One 5G is a better device, it is way more expensive than Samsung Galaxy S5 Active, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Samsung Galaxy S5 Active. So if you want that extra specs and features, you can buy Motorola One 5G, else you can save a couple dollars and get the Samsung Galaxy S5 Active, giving up some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.