Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 4.4.4, 4.4.2 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2014-06-23 | 2019-12-04 |
| 5.72 x 2.89 x 0.35 inches | 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Gray, Green and Red | Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 199.00 | $ 350.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 432 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 6.72 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.90 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.69 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 480 hours standby time 29 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola One Hyper is a little bit better than the Samsung Galaxy S5 Active, with a 79.8 score against 75.6. Both phones in our current comparison include Android operating system, but the Motorola One Hyper has older 11 version while Samsung Galaxy S5 Active has Android 4.4.4. The Motorola One Hyper is a somewhat heavier cellphone than Samsung Galaxy S5 Active, but they have the same thickness.
The Galaxy S5 Active counts with a little better hardware performance than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM and lesser cores , it also counts with a graphics processing unit. The Samsung Galaxy S5 Active has a more vivid screen than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has a really smaller screen and a little bit worse 1920 x 1080 resolution, it also counts with a quite greater screen pixels density.
The Motorola One Hyper shoots much better photos and videos than Galaxy S5 Active, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same video resolution, the Motorola One Hyper also has a lot more MP back-facing camera. Motorola One Hyper features a very superior memory capacity for applications and games than Galaxy S5 Active, because it has a SD card slot that admits a maximum of 1000 GB and 128 GB internal storage.
The Motorola One Hyper has a very superior battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S5 Active, because it has a 4000mAh battery size instead of 2800mAh.
Although Motorola One Hyper is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Samsung Galaxy S5 Active, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Samsung Galaxy S5 Active. If you want to save a few dollars, you can buy Samsung Galaxy S5 Active, letting go some specs and features, but you will get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.