Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 4.4.4, 4.4.2 | -- |
| 2014-06-23 | 2019-05-15 |
| 5.72 x 2.89 x 0.35 inches | 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Gray, Green and Red | Blue and Brown |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 199.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 432 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 6.72 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.69 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 480 hours standby time 29 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola One Vision has a global score of 80.7, which is just a bit better than the Galaxy S5 Active's 75.6 general score. The Motorola One Vision design is extremely newer and just a little thinner, but just a bit heavier than the Galaxy S5 Active. Samsung Galaxy S5 Active counts with a much better screen than Motorola One Vision, although it has a quite worse display pixel density, a little worse 1920 x 1080 resolution and a little bit smaller screen.
Galaxy S5 Active counts with a bit better processor than Motorola One Vision, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory and 4 lesser processing cores (although faster), it also counts with an extra graphics processing unit. The Motorola One Vision takes a lot better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy S5 Active, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Motorola One Vision also has a camera in the back with lot more mega-pixels.
The Motorola One Vision features much more memory capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy S5 Active, because it has more internal memory capacity and a SD extension slot that holds up to 512 GB. Motorola One Vision features improved battery life than Samsung Galaxy S5 Active, because it has a 3500mAh battery capacity against 2800mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.