Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 4.4.4, 4.4.2 | -- |
| 2014-06-23 | 2019-09-05 |
| 5.72 x 2.89 x 0.35 inches | 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Gray, Green and Red | Brushed bronze, Cosmic purple and Electric gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 199.00 | $ 450.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 432 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 6.72 | 12.42 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.69 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 480 hours standby time 29 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola One Zoom has a global score of 80, which is slightly better than the Galaxy S5 Active's 75.6 general score. Motorola One Zoom is a somewhat heavier cellphone than Galaxy S5 Active, but both of them are 0.35inches thick. The Samsung Galaxy S5 Active counts with a bit faster processor than Motorola One Zoom, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory and an inferior number of cores (although they are faster), it also counts with a graphics co-processor.
Samsung Galaxy S5 Active features a more vivid display than Motorola One Zoom, because although it has a much smaller display and a bit lower resolution of 1920 x 1080, it also counts with a just a bit better screen density. Motorola One Zoom counts with a greater camera than Galaxy S5 Active, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same video frame rate, the Motorola One Zoom also has a camera in the back with a much higher resolution.
The Motorola One Zoom has a superior memory to store more games and applications than Galaxy S5 Active, and although they both have a SD memory card expansion slot that holds a maximum of 128 GB, the Motorola One Zoom also has 112 GB more internal memory capacity. Motorola One Zoom has a much better battery performance than Galaxy S5 Active, because it has a 4000mAh battery size.
Although Motorola One Zoom is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Samsung Galaxy S5 Active, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Samsung Galaxy S5 Active. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can buy Samsung Galaxy S5 Active, giving up a few specs and features, but you will get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.