Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 83.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Oppo |
| Android 4.4.4, 4.4.2 | Android 10 |
| 2014-06-23 | 2020-05-14 |
| 5.72 x 2.89 x 0.35 inches | 6.50 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Gray, Green and Red | Ocean |
| -- | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 199.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 3168 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 432 pixels per inch | 519 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 6.72 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 8.69 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.5 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4260mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 480 hours standby time 29 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
OPPO Find X2 Pro has a score of 83.1, which is better than Samsung Galaxy S5 Active's general score of 75.6. The OPPO Find X2 Pro is a somewhat heavier phone than Samsung Galaxy S5 Active, but both of them have the same thickness. Both devices in this review include Android operating system, but the OPPO Find X2 Pro has an older 10 version and Samsung Galaxy S5 Active has Android 4.4.4 version.
The OPPO Find X2 Pro has a little more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy S5 Active, because it has a lot higher resolution of 1440 x 3168px, a much bigger display and a bit greater screen density. The OPPO Find X2 Pro features much more memory to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S5 Active, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 496 GB more internal memory capacity.
The OPPO Find X2 Pro counts with a little bit better hardware performance than Galaxy S5 Active, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics co-processor, it also counts with more RAM and a larger number of cores. OPPO Find X2 Pro takes a lot better videos and photos than Galaxy S5 Active, and although they both have the same (4K) video definition, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has faster 60 frames per second video frame rates and a way more MP camera in the back.
OPPO Find X2 Pro counts with a really longer battery performance than Galaxy S5 Active, because it has 4260mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.