Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 4.4.4, 4.4.2 | -- |
| 2014-06-23 | 2021-03-17 |
| 5.72 x 2.89 x 0.35 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Gray, Green and Red | -- |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 199.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 432 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 6.72 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.69 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.5 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 480 hours standby time 29 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A52 is way better than Samsung Galaxy S5 Active, with a score of 90.7 against 75.6. The Samsung Galaxy A52 body is a lot newer and just a little bit thinner than the Samsung Galaxy S5 Active's, although it is heavier. The Samsung Galaxy S5 Active has a bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A52, because although it has a lower number of cores and a lower amount of RAM, it also counts with a graphics co-processor.
Galaxy S5 Active has a better looking screen than Galaxy A52, because although it has a quite lower 1920 x 1080 pixels resolution and a much smaller screen, it also counts with a little bit better pixel count in each screen inch. The Samsung Galaxy A52 features a much greater memory capacity for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy S5 Active, because it has 128 GB internal memory and a slot for an SD memory card that supports up to 1 TB.
Galaxy A52 counts with a way better battery performance than Galaxy S5 Active, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 2800mAh. The Galaxy A52 has a very superior camera than Samsung Galaxy S5 Active, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Galaxy A52 also has a camera with a lot higher 64 megapixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.