Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 4.4.4, 4.4.2 | Android 12, 11 |
| 2014-06-23 | 2021-03-19 |
| 5.72 x 2.89 x 0.35 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Gray, Green and Red | -- |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 199.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 432 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 6.72 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.69 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.5 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 480 hours standby time 29 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A52 5G has an overall score of 91.3, which is a lot better than the Samsung Galaxy S5 Active's 75.6 score. Both of these devices use Android operating system, but the Galaxy A52 5G has the previous 12 version while Samsung Galaxy S5 Active has Android 4.4.4 version. Galaxy A52 5G is a notably newer and a little thinner cellphone than the Samsung Galaxy S5 Active, but it is also somewhat heavier.
Galaxy S5 Active counts with a brighter display than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, because although it has a bit worse 1920 x 1080 resolution and a much smaller screen, it also counts with a bit better pixels density. The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has a much better storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy S5 Active, because it has 128 GB internal memory and an external memory slot that admits up to 1 TB.
The Samsung Galaxy S5 Active counts with just a little better processing power than Galaxy A52 5G, because although it has an inferior number of cores and 4 GB lesser RAM memory, it also counts with an extra GPU. The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G features a way better battery performance than Galaxy S5 Active, because it has a 61% bigger battery capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G captures a lot better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy S5 Active, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G also has a back camera with lot more megapixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.