Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 92.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 4.4.4, 4.4.2 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2014-06-23 | 2020-08-07 |
| 5.72 x 2.89 x 0.35 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Gray, Green and Red | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white |
| -- | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 199.00 | $ 603.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 432 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 6.72 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.69 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.5 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 480 hours standby time 29 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip 5G is way better than the Galaxy S5 Active, getting a overall score of 92.3 against 75.6. Both of these phones work with Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy Z Flip 5G has 11 version while Galaxy S5 Active has Android 4.4.4. Galaxy Z Flip 5G is a notably newer and somewhat thinner phone than the Galaxy S5 Active, but it's just a bit heavier.
The Galaxy S5 Active features a slightly better display than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has a bit worse resolution of 1920 x 1080 and a lot smaller display, it also counts with a little higher quantity of pixels in each inch in the screen. Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a little faster processor than Samsung Galaxy S5 Active, because although it has doesn't have a GPU, it also counts with a greater amount of RAM memory and 4 more cores.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a much greater storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S5 Active, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 240 GB more internal memory capacity. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G features longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy S5 Active, because it has a 3300mAh battery capacity against 2800mAh.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G shoots better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S5 Active, although it has a lower 3840x2160 video quality and a camera with a way lower resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G is a lot more expensive than Galaxy S5 Active, but you can get a much better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.