Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 4.4.4, 4.4.2 | Android 10 |
| 2014-06-23 | 2020-10-13 |
| 5.72 x 2.89 x 0.35 inches | 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 7.57 ounces |
| Gray, Green and Red | Atlantic blue, Pearl gray and Rose gold |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 199.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 432 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 6.72 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution |
| 8.69 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.5 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4820mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 480 hours standby time 29 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 6.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite has a global score of 81.2, which is just a bit better than Samsung Galaxy S5 Active's 75.6 overall score. The Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite is a noticeably heavier device than the Samsung Galaxy S5 Active, but they have the same thickness. Both of these phones have Android operating system, but Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite has older 10 version while Samsung Galaxy S5 Active has Android 4.4.4 version.
Galaxy S5 Active has a bit better processing unit than Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM and less CPU cores (although they are faster), it also counts with a graphics processor. The Galaxy S5 Active counts with a much better display than Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite, because although it has a way smaller display and a quite lower resolution of 1920 x 1080 pixels, it also counts with a quite greater amount of pixels per display inch.
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite has a superior camera than Samsung Galaxy S5 Active, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same video definition, the Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite also has a back facing camera with a much higher 64 mega pixels resolution. The Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite features more storage to install games and applications than Galaxy S5 Active, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 64 GB internal storage.
The Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite has a way better battery life than Galaxy S5 Active, because it has 4820mAh of battery capacity against 2800mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.