Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 4.4.4, 4.4.2 | -- |
| 2014-06-23 | 2018-04-03 |
| 5.72 x 2.89 x 0.35 inches | 5.94 x 2.95 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Gray, Green and Red | Black and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 199.00 | $ 639.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 432 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 6.72 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.69 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3400mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 480 hours standby time 29 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s is better than Galaxy S5 Active, with a score of 83.8 against 75.6. Although the Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s is heavier than the Galaxy S5 Active, it's just a little bit thinner and also incredibly newer. The Galaxy S5 Active counts with a better screen than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, because although it has a little bit worse resolution of 1920 x 1080px and a little smaller screen, it also counts with a just a little greater pixel density.
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s counts with a superior storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy S5 Active, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage. The Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s counts with a little bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy S5 Active, because although it has doesn't have a GPU, it also counts with a greater number of faster cores and a greater amount of RAM.
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s has superior battery life than Galaxy S5 Active, because it has a 3400mAh battery size against 2800mAh. The Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s counts with a much better camera than Galaxy S5 Active, although it has a camera in the back with a lot lower resolution and a lower video quality.
Although Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Galaxy S5 Active, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Galaxy S5 Active. So if you need that extra features, you can buy Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, else you can save some dollars and buy the Galaxy S5 Active, giving up some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.