Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 83 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 4.4.4, 4.4.2 | Android 10 |
| 2014-06-23 | 2021-01-18 |
| 5.72 x 2.89 x 0.35 inches | 6.37 x 3.04 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Gray, Green and Red | Daybreak purple and Nightfall black |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 199.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 432 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 800U chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A76 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 6.72 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.69 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.5 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Li-Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 480 hours standby time 29 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T has an overall score of 83, which is slightly better than the Galaxy S5 Active's 75.6 overall score. Even though Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T is notably newer than Galaxy S5 Active, it is a little bit thicker and somewhat heavier. Both devices in this comparison review include Android OS (Operating System), but the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T has an older 10 version while Galaxy S5 Active has Android 4.4.4 version.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T and Samsung Galaxy S5 Active count with extremely similar CPUs, because although the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T has doesn't have a graphics co-processor, it also counts with more processing cores (but slower) and a greater amount of RAM. The Samsung Galaxy S5 Active features a sharper display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T, because although it has a really smaller display and a bit worse 1920 x 1080px resolution, it also counts with a just a little better pixels density.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T features a very superior storage capacity to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S5 Active, because it has a SD card slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB and more internal storage. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T shoots much clearer pictures and videos than Galaxy S5 Active, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T also has a back camera with way more mega pixels.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T counts with a very superior battery performance than Galaxy S5 Active, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 2800mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.