Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 70.8 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 5.1 | -- |
| -- | 2016-09-29 |
| 5.59 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches | 6.29 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Gray | 16 777 216 |
| -- | Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 305.00 | $ 115.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 432 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 7 Octa 7580 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-T720 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 8.01 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 6.72 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 29.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Dual SIM |
| 6.5 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 3200mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 15 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V20 is just a bit better than Galaxy S5 Neo, getting a 77 score against 70.8. The LG V20 design is a little thinner but somewhat heavier than Galaxy S5 Neo. The Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo counts with a little sharper display than LG V20, although it has a bit smaller display, a lot worse resolution of 1920 x 1080px and a just a little less pixels per inch of display.
LG V20 has much more storage to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo, because it has an external SD slot that allows up to 1,95 TB and 48 GB more internal memory capacity. LG V20 has a more powerful processor than Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo, because it has a higher amount of RAM memory and a higher number of cores.
LG V20 has a little better battery life than Galaxy S5 Neo, because it has a 14 percent bigger battery size. LG V20 shoots just a bit better videos and photos than Galaxy S5 Neo, and although they both have a 16 megapixels camera in the back, the LG V20 also has a lot better video quality and a larger aperture.
The LG V20 not only is the best phones in this comparison, but it's also very cheap compared to the other phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.