Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 70.8 | 79.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 5.1 | Android 11, 10 |
| -- | 2020-04-16 |
| 5.59 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches | 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Gray | Mystic indigo |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| $ 305.00 | $ 300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 432 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 7 Octa 7580 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-T720 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 8.01 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 6.72 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 15 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola Moto G Stylus is much better than the Galaxy S5 Neo, with a general score of 79.7 against 70.8. Even being the best in this review, the Motorola Moto G Stylus body is notably heavier and thicker than Galaxy S5 Neo. Both phones in our current comparison include Android operating system, but Motorola Moto G Stylus has the newer 11 version and Galaxy S5 Neo has Android 5.1 version, providing you lots of additional features and increased performance.
Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo features a sharper display than Motorola Moto G Stylus, because although it has a bit worse 1920 x 1080 resolution and a much smaller screen, it also counts with a just a bit higher amount of pixels per inch in the display. Motorola Moto G Stylus has a better performing processing unit than Galaxy S5 Neo, because it has a greater amount of RAM and a larger number of faster cores.
Moto G Stylus takes a lot better videos and photos than Galaxy S5 Neo, because it has a back-facing camera with a lot better resolution, a lot bigger aperture and a way better video definition. The Motorola Moto G Stylus counts with a way bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy S5 Neo, because it has an external memory card slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB and more internal storage.
The Motorola Moto G Stylus features a much better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity against 2800mAh.
The Moto G Stylus not only is the best devices of the ones we are comparing here, but it's also cheaper, which makes this phone a simple decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.