Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 4.4.2 | Android 14 |
| 2014-06-23 | 2024-08-08 |
| 5.67 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches | 6.33 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Blue and Red | Jungle Green, Koala Gray and Peach Fuzz |
| -- | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 299.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2712 x 1220 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 432 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1600 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 AE (4 nm) chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | processor |
| 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 6.72 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.79 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Li-Ion Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 390 hours standby time 21 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 has an overall score of 81.2, which is slightly better than the Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport's 77.8 general score. The Motorola Edge 50 design is a lot newer and somewhat thinner than the Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport's, but it's somewhat heavier. Both devices in this review have Android operating system, but Motorola Edge 50 has the previous 14 version while Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport has Android 4.4.2 version.
The Galaxy S5 Sport features a very superior CPU than Motorola Edge 50, because although it has an inferior number of cores and a smaller amount of RAM, it also counts with a GPU. The Motorola Edge 50 counts with a bit sharper display than Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has a higher 1220 x 2712 resolution, a bit more pixels per inch of display and a lot bigger display.
The Motorola Edge 50 shoots much better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, and although they both have the same (4K) video definition and the same video frame rates, the Motorola Edge 50 also has a larger aperture, a back-facing camera with a lot higher resolution and a way bigger camera sensor.
Motorola Edge 50 counts with a lot bigger memory for games and applications than Galaxy S5 Sport, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage. The Motorola Edge 50 has a superior battery life than Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 2800mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.