Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 79.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 4.4.2 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2014-06-23 | 2020-04-16 |
| 5.67 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches | 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Blue and Red | Mystic indigo |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 299.00 | $ 300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 432 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 6.72 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 390 hours standby time 21 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola Moto G Stylus has a general score of 79.7, which is just a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport's 77.8 score. These phones use Android OS (Operating System), but Motorola Moto G Stylus has the previous 11 version and Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport has Android 4.4.2. The Motorola Moto G Stylus body is notably newer than Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport's, although it's heavier and a little bit thicker.
The Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport has a bit better hardware performance than Moto G Stylus, because although it has 4 lesser processing cores (although faster) and a smaller amount of RAM, it also counts with a GPU. Galaxy S5 Sport features a better looking screen than Moto G Stylus, because although it has a really smaller screen and a little bit worse 1920 x 1080px resolution, it also counts with a little higher pixel quantity in each inch of screen.
Moto G Stylus counts with much more storage for applications and games than Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity and a slot for an external memory card that holds up to 512 GB. Motorola Moto G Stylus counts with a much longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has a 43 percent more battery size.
Motorola Moto G Stylus features a better camera than Galaxy S5 Sport, and although they both have the same video definition and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Motorola Moto G Stylus also has a much larger aperture for better photos and videos in low light situations, a lot larger camera sensor taking much better quality pictures and videos and a back camera with lot more MP.
Moto G Stylus costs a little more money than the Galaxy S5 Sport, but it's still a great deal, as you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.