Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Oppo |
| Android 4.4.2 | Android 11 |
| 2014-06-23 | 2021-03-30 |
| 5.67 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches | 6.43 x 2.91 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| Blue and Red | Blue and Gloss Black |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 299.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 3216 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 432 pixels per inch | 526 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 6.72 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.79 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 390 hours standby time 21 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The OPPO Find X3 Pro has a score of 79.9, which is a bit better than Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport's 77.8 global score. These phones include Android OS (operating system), but OPPO Find X3 Pro has the older 11 version while Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport has Android 4.4.2. Although OPPO Find X3 Pro is somewhat heavier than the Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, it's just a bit thinner and also noticeably newer.
The Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport has a bit more vivid display than OPPO Find X3 Pro, although it has a much lower resolution of 1920 x 1080px, a way smaller screen and a little bit less pixels per inch of display. The OPPO Find X3 Pro has just a little better processing power than Galaxy S5 Sport, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics co-processor, it also counts with 4 more cpu cores and a larger amount of RAM.
OPPO Find X3 Pro has a much better storage capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy S5 Sport, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity. OPPO Find X3 Pro captures much better photos and videos than Galaxy S5 Sport, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the OPPO Find X3 Pro also has a much higher 50 megapixels resolution camera, a bigger aperture, a much bigger sensor which offers a much better photo and video quality and better video frame rate.
OPPO Find X3 Pro has a way better battery duration than Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has a 61% greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.