Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 91.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 4.4.2 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2014-06-23 | 2020-06-19 |
| 5.67 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches | 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Blue and Red | Prism Cube black, Prism Cube blue and Prism Cube sliver |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 299.00 | $ 381.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 432 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 6.72 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 390 hours standby time 21 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A71 5G is much better than Galaxy S5 Sport, having a general score of 91.8 against 77.8. Both phones in this comparison review come with Android OS, but the Galaxy A71 5G has an older 11 version and Galaxy S5 Sport has Android 4.4.2 version. The Galaxy A71 5G is a extremely newer and just a little thinner device than the Galaxy S5 Sport, but it's also somewhat heavier.
Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport has a much better display than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G, because although it has a much smaller display and a quite lower 1920 x 1080 pixels resolution, it also counts with a little bit greater pixels density. Galaxy A71 5G has a much greater storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has 128 GB internal memory and a SD extension slot that allows a maximum of 1000 GB.
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G's processor is just as good as the Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport one, because although the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G has doesn't have an additional graphics processor, it also counts with a greater number of cores and a larger amount of RAM memory. Galaxy A71 5G counts with a greater camera than Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, and although they both have the same video quality and the same video frame rates, the Galaxy A71 5G also has a bigger aperture to capture better photography and videos in low light environments, a much larger sensor shooting way higher quality photos and a camera with much more mega-pixels.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G has a much better battery life than Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 2800mAh.
The Galaxy A71 5G costs more money than Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, but you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.