Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 4.4.2 | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2014-06-23 | 2017-02-24 |
| 5.67 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches | 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Blue and Red | Black and Gold |
| -- | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 299.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 432 pixels per inch | 367 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 7.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 510 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 6.72 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 9.79 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 390 hours standby time 21 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0, EDR | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro is a little bit better than Galaxy S5 Sport, having an 81 score against 77.8. Both devices in this comparison work with Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro has a newer 6.0 Marshmallow version while Galaxy S5 Sport has Android 4.4.2. Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro's design is newer and notably thinner, but also somewhat heavier than the Galaxy S5 Sport.
The Galaxy S5 Sport features a little bit better hardware performance than Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM and 4 lesser CPU cores , it also counts with an additional GPU. Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport counts with a more vivid display than Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has a little bit smaller display, and they both have the same exact resolution of 1920 x 1080px, the Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport also counts with a just a little better display pixels density.
Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport features just a bit better camera than Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not nice for taking pictures or video in low-light environments, and they both have a camera with a 16 mega pixels resolution, the Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport also counts with a much better (4K) video definition.
Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro features a much better memory capacity for applications and games than Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has a SD memory card expansion slot that allows up to 256 GB and 64 GB internal storage capacity. Galaxy C9 Pro has a really longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity against 2800mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.