Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| Android 4.4.2 | Android 14 |
| 2014-06-23 | 2024-04-03 |
| 5.67 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Blue and Red | Black and White |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 299.00 | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 8 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 432 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | processor |
| 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 6.72 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Li-Ion Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 390 hours standby time 21 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a global score of 77.8, which is slightly better than Galaxy S5 Sport's 77.8 general score. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro body is notably newer and incredibly thinner, but also heavier than Galaxy S5 Sport. These phones work with Android OS (Operating System), but the vivo X Fold 3 Pro has the previous 14 version while Galaxy S5 Sport has Android 4.4.2 version.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a much better looking screen than Galaxy S5 Sport, because although it has a little inferior amount of pixels per inch in the display, it also counts with a lot better 2200 x 2480 pixels resolution and a really bigger screen. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a much better memory capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy S5 Sport, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory.
Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport features a very superior hardware performance than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM and an inferior number of cores (but faster), it also counts with a graphics processing unit. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a superior battery duration than Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has 5700mAh of battery capacity.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro captures much clearer videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has a much bigger camera sensor providing a way better image quality, a much bigger camera aperture to capture better low-light captures and video, a lot higher resolution back-facing camera and a lot higher video definition.
Although vivo X Fold 3 Pro is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Galaxy S5 Sport, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Galaxy S5 Sport. So if you want that extra features and specs, you can buy the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, else you can save a couple dollars and get the Galaxy S5 Sport, resigning some specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.