Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 4.4.2 | -- |
| 2014-06-23 | 2018-08-29 |
| 5.67 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches | 6.12 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Blue and Red | Black, Blue and Red |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 299.00 | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2246 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 432 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 6.72 | 16.38 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 390 hours standby time 21 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has a general score of 85.5, which is slightly better than the Galaxy S5 Sport's score of 77.8. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 construction has the same thickness than the Galaxy S5 Sport, but it's heavier. Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport features a little more vivid screen than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because although it has a little smaller screen and a bit worse 1920 x 1080 resolution, it also counts with a just a little higher count of pixels in each inch of display.
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has just a bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics processing unit, it also counts with a higher amount of RAM memory and a larger number of cores. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with a much greater storage to install games and applications than Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has a SD card slot that admits a maximum of 256 GB and more internal storage.
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has a very superior battery life than Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has a 43 percent more battery size. Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with just a bit better camera than Galaxy S5 Sport, because although it has a much less MP resolution back-facing camera and a worse 3840x2160 video definition, it also counts with a bigger back-facing camera sensor taking higher quality pictures and a larger aperture for better photography and videos in low-light environments.
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 costs more than Galaxy S5 Sport, but it's still a good choice, because you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.