Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy S6
128 GBSM-G920F
| Global Score | |
| 87.3 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 5.0 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2015-04-11 | 2019-05-10 |
| 5.65 x 2.78 x 0.27 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 4.87 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gold and White | Aurora black |
| Aluminium and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 245.00 | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.9 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2100 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T760 MP8 (650 MHz) GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 10.08 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2550mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 4.56 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S6 has a global score of 87.3, which is a little bit better than the LG V50 ThinQ's 83.7 global score. Both devices we compare here include Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy S6 has 5.0 version while LG V50 ThinQ has Android 10. The Galaxy S6 body is somewhat thinner and a lot lighter than LG V50 ThinQ, although it was released many years before.
Galaxy S6 has a bit better hardware performance than LG V50 ThinQ, because although it has lesser RAM memory, and they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy S6 also counts with an additional graphics processing unit and a 64 bits processing unit. Galaxy S6 has a better screen than LG V50 ThinQ, because although it has a little lower 2560 x 1440 resolution and a lot smaller display, it also counts with a little higher pixels density.
The LG V50 ThinQ has a much bigger storage for games and applications than Galaxy S6, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal memory, the LG V50 ThinQ also has a slot for an external memory card that supports up to 1,95 TB. LG V50 ThinQ counts with a really longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S6, because it has a 57 percent bigger battery capacity.
The LG V50 ThinQ captures just a bit better pictures and videos than Galaxy S6, because although it has a worse 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a way lower 12 megapixels resolution back camera, and they both have a same size camera sensor, the LG V50 ThinQ also counts with a much larger camera aperture for better low light captures and videos.
Galaxy S6 is a bit more expensive than the LG V50 ThinQ, but it's still a great choice, as you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.