Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy S6
32 GBSM-G920F
| Global Score | |
| 83.5 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 5.0 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2015-04-11 | 2019-05-10 |
| 5.65 x 2.78 x 0.27 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 4.87 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gold and White | Aurora black |
| Aluminium and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 260.00 | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.9 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2100 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T760 MP8 (650 MHz) GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 10.08 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 5.8 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2550mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 4.56 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V50 ThinQ is just a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy S6, with an 83.7 score against 83.5. The LG V50 ThinQ construction is incredibly newer, but extremely heavier and somewhat thicker than the Samsung Galaxy S6. Both phones in our current comparison use Android operating system, but LG V50 ThinQ has a more recent 10 version while Samsung Galaxy S6 has Android 5.0 version, providing a couple additional features.
The Galaxy S6 counts with a sharper screen than LG V50 ThinQ, because although it has a bit lower 2560 x 1440px resolution and a much smaller screen, it also counts with a just a bit greater screen density. The Samsung Galaxy S6 features just a bit better hardware performance than LG V50 ThinQ, because although it has 3 GB lesser RAM memory, and they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy S6 also counts with a GPU and a 64 bits CPU.
LG V50 ThinQ counts with just a bit better camera than Galaxy S6, because although it has a much lower resolution camera in the back and a lower (4K) video definition, and they both have a 0.38 inches back camera sensor, the LG V50 ThinQ also counts with a way bigger aperture to take better low-light photos and videos.
The LG V50 ThinQ counts with a much bigger memory capacity for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy S6, because it has 96 GB more internal storage and a slot for an external memory card that holds up to 1,95 TB. LG V50 ThinQ has a superior battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S6, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity instead of 2550mAh.
LG V50 ThinQ not only is the best devices in our current comparison, but it's also the cheapest one, which makes it an easy choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.