Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.9 | 86.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 5.0 | iOS 15.x |
| -- | 2022-03-18 |
| 5.78 x 2.90 x 0.35 inches | 5.45 x 2.65 x 0.29 inches |
| -- | 5.08 ounces |
| -- | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 245.00 | $ 429.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 4.7 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1334 x 750 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 576 pixels per inch | 326 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.9 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2100 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | 64-bit Avalanche and Blizzard, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 3220 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T760 MP8 (650 MHz) GPU | Apple 4-core GPU |
| 10.08 | 10.62 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 5.8 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.47 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 2018mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 3.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone SE (2022) is slightly better than Galaxy S6 Active, getting a general score of 86.6 against 80.9. The Apple iPhone SE (2022) has iOS 15.x OS, and Galaxy S6 Active comes with Android 5.0 OS. Samsung Galaxy S6 Active features an incredibly better screen than Apple iPhone SE (2022), because it has a much better pixel density, a lot better 2560 x 1440 resolution and a bit bigger display.
The Apple iPhone SE (2022) features a little better performance than Galaxy S6 Active, because although it has an inferior number of cores and doesn't have a graphics processor, and they both have a 64-bit processor, the Apple iPhone SE (2022) also counts with 1 GB more RAM memory. The iPhone SE (2022) counts with a better camera than Galaxy S6 Active, because although it has a lower 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a camera with much less megapixels, it also counts with a larger aperture for better low light photography.
The iPhone SE (2022) features a much bigger memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S6 Active, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with more internal memory. The Galaxy S6 Active features a very superior battery performance than iPhone SE (2022), because it has a 3500mAh battery size.
Although iPhone SE (2022) is a better device, it is way more expensive than Samsung Galaxy S6 Active, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Samsung Galaxy S6 Active. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can get the Samsung Galaxy S6 Active, giving up a couple features and specs, but you'll get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.