Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.9 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 5.0 | Android 14 |
| -- | 2024-08-08 |
| 5.78 x 2.90 x 0.35 inches | 6.33 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches |
| -- | 6.35 ounces |
| -- | Jungle Green, Koala Gray and Peach Fuzz |
| -- | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 245.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2712 x 1220 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1600 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.9 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 AE (4 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2100 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-T760 MP8 (650 MHz) GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 10.08 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSD external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 5.8 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 8.47 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 has a score of 81.2, which is a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy S6 Active's 80.9 general score. Both devices in this review use Android OS, but the Motorola Edge 50 has 14 version and Samsung Galaxy S6 Active has Android 5.0. Samsung Galaxy S6 Active features an extremely better processor than Motorola Edge 50, because although it has 5 GB lesser RAM memory, and they both have 8 cores, the Samsung Galaxy S6 Active also counts with an additional graphics processor and a 64-bits CPU.
The Samsung Galaxy S6 Active has a slightly better looking display than Motorola Edge 50, because although it has a lot smaller display, it also counts with a higher quantity of pixels per display inch and a bit higher 2560 x 1440 resolution. Motorola Edge 50 features a lot bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy S6 Active, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity.
The Motorola Edge 50 takes much clearer photographs and videos than Galaxy S6 Active, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Motorola Edge 50 also has a much bigger camera sensor which provides a lot better image and video quality, a camera in the back with way more MP and a larger camera aperture.
The Motorola Edge 50 counts with a way better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S6 Active, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.