Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.9 | 79.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 5.0 | Android 11, 10 |
| -- | 2020-04-16 |
| 5.78 x 2.90 x 0.35 inches | 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches |
| -- | 6.77 ounces |
| -- | Mystic indigo |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 245.00 | $ 300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 576 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2100 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T760 MP8 (650 MHz) GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 10.08 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 5.8 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.47 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S6 Active has a general score of 80.9, which is a bit better than Moto G Stylus's overall score of 79.7. The Galaxy S6 Active is a much lighter and a little thinner cellphone than Moto G Stylus. Both of these phones include Android OS, but the Galaxy S6 Active has the older 5.0 version and Moto G Stylus has Android 11.
The Samsung Galaxy S6 Active counts with an incredibly better looking screen than Motorola Moto G Stylus, because although it has a much smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 2560 x 1440 and a better pixel amount in each inch in the screen. The Samsung Galaxy S6 Active counts with a faster processing unit than Motorola Moto G Stylus, because although it has a lower amount of RAM, and they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Samsung Galaxy S6 Active also counts with a 64-bit processing unit and a graphics co-processor.
Moto G Stylus has a lot bigger memory capacity to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S6 Active, because it has 128 GB internal storage. Moto G Stylus has just a bit longer battery life than Galaxy S6 Active, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity. Moto G Stylus takes much better photographs and videos than Galaxy S6 Active, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same video frame rates, the Moto G Stylus also has a lot bigger camera sensor which offers a lot better image and video quality, a camera in the back with much more mega-pixels and a larger camera aperture for better photos and video in low-light environments.
Even being the best phone in our current comparison, the Samsung Galaxy S6 Active is also by far the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.