Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.9 | 82.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 5.0 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| -- | 2019-06-20 |
| 5.78 x 2.90 x 0.35 inches | 6.11 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| -- | 5.93 ounces |
| -- | Cocktail Orange, Daybreak Black and Seawater Blue |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 245.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SDM675 chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2100 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T760 MP8 (650 MHz) GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 10.08 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 5.8 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 8.47 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 3400mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A60 has a global score of 82.3, which is a little bit better than the Galaxy S6 Active's global score of 80.9. Both of these devices have Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy A60 has 11 version while Galaxy S6 Active has Android 5.0, so it provides you a couple nice extra features and improved performance.
The Samsung Galaxy S6 Active features a little better performance than Samsung Galaxy A60, because although it has lesser RAM, and they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Samsung Galaxy S6 Active also counts with a 64-bits processing unit and a graphics processor. Galaxy S6 Active has a much better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A60, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 2560 x 1440px and a greater display pixels density.
The Samsung Galaxy A60 counts with a lot bigger storage to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy S6 Active, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 96 GB more internal storage. The Galaxy S6 Active features a bit superior battery performance than Galaxy A60, because it has a 3 percent larger battery size.
The Samsung Galaxy A60 shoots much clearer pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy S6 Active, because although it has a tinier back camera sensor which offers a worse image and video quality, and they both have a 16 mega-pixels resolution back camera, the same video frame rates and the same video quality, the Samsung Galaxy A60 also counts with a larger aperture to take better photography and video in low light situations.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.