Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.9 | 84.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 5.0 | -- |
| -- | 2019-05-29 |
| 5.78 x 2.90 x 0.35 inches | 6.50 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches |
| -- | 7.76 ounces |
| -- | Angel gold, Ghost white and Phantom black |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 245.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2100 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-T760 MP8 (650 MHz) GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 10.08 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 5.8 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.47 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A80 is a little bit better than the Samsung Galaxy S6 Active, having an 84.9 score against 80.9. The Galaxy S6 Active has a much sharper display than Galaxy A80, because although it has a really smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 2560 x 1440 and a higher screen pixel density.
Galaxy S6 Active features a bit superior processor than Samsung Galaxy A80, because although it has lesser RAM, and they both have 8 processing cores, the Galaxy S6 Active also counts with a 64 bits processor and a graphics co-processor. The Galaxy A80 has a much bigger storage for games and applications than Galaxy S6 Active, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy A80 features a very superior camera than Samsung Galaxy S6 Active, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not good for low light photography and video, and they both have the same video resolution and the same video frame rate, the Samsung Galaxy A80 also counts with a way better 48 megapixels resolution back facing camera and a much bigger sensor which provides a much higher photo and video quality.
Samsung Galaxy A80 counts with a little better battery life than Galaxy S6 Active, because it has 3700mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.