Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.9 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 5.0 | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| -- | 2017-02-24 |
| 5.78 x 2.90 x 0.35 inches | 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches |
| -- | 6.63 ounces |
| -- | Black and Gold |
| -- | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 245.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 367 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.9 | 7.8 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2100 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T760 MP8 (650 MHz) GPU | Adreno 510 GPU |
| 10.08 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 5.8 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 8.47 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy C9 Pro is just a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy S6 Active, with a general score of 81 against 80.9. These phones include Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy C9 Pro has 6.0 Marshmallow version while Samsung Galaxy S6 Active has Android 5.0, so it provides some additional features.
Samsung Galaxy S6 Active has a superior processing power than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has a lower amount of RAM, and they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy S6 Active also counts with a 64-bit processing unit and a graphics processor. Galaxy S6 Active has a much better display than Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a much greater count of pixels per inch in the screen and a higher resolution of 2560 x 1440.
The Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro has a lot bigger memory for games and applications than Galaxy S6 Active, because it has 32 GB more internal memory. The Galaxy C9 Pro counts with a bit better battery duration than Galaxy S6 Active, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity. Galaxy C9 Pro captures just a bit better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S6 Active. They have the same video frame rates, the same (Full HD) video definition, the same aperture and a camera in the back with a 16 megapixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.