Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.9 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| Android 5.0 | Android 14 |
| -- | 2024-04-03 |
| 5.78 x 2.90 x 0.35 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| -- | 7.73 ounces |
| -- | Black and White |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 245.00 | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 8 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.9 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2100 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Mali-T760 MP8 (650 MHz) GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 10.08 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSD external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 5.8 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 8.47 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S6 Active has an overall score of 80.9, which is just a bit better than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro's overall score of 77.8. Both of these phones have Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy S6 Active has the older 5.0 version while vivo X Fold 3 Pro has Android 14 version. The Samsung Galaxy S6 Active construction is way lighter but extremely thicker than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a little more vivid screen than Galaxy S6 Active, because although it has a way worse pixels quantity per screen inch, it also counts with a higher 2200 x 2480 resolution and a lot bigger display. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a superior storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy S6 Active, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with more internal memory.
The Galaxy S6 Active counts with a lot better hardware performance than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, because although it has lesser RAM memory, and they both have 8 cores, the Galaxy S6 Active also counts with a 64 bits processing unit and an additional GPU. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a much longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S6 Active, because it has 5700mAh of battery capacity against 3500mAh.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro captures much clearer pictures and videos than Galaxy S6 Active, because it has a lot better video resolution, a bigger aperture, a camera with way more megapixels and a way larger back camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones we compare here, Galaxy S6 Active is also by far the cheapest one, making it an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.