Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy S6
DuosSM-G9200
| Global Score | |
| 87.4 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| Android 5.0 | Android 14 |
| 2015-04-11 | 2024-04-03 |
| 5.65 x 2.78 x 0.27 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 4.87 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gold and White | Black and White |
| Aluminium and Glass | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 252.00 | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 8 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.9 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2100 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Mali-T760 MP8 (650 MHz) GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 10.08 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2550mAh Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.56 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S6 is better than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, getting a score of 87.4 against 77.8. The Samsung Galaxy S6 body is way lighter than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, but it is a lot thicker and was released many years before. Both devices we compare here include Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy S6 has the older 5.0 version and vivo X Fold 3 Pro has Android 14 version.
Galaxy S6 has a lot better processing power than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, because although it has 13 GB less RAM, and they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy S6 also counts with a graphics co-processor and a 64-bit processing unit. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a little more vivid screen than Galaxy S6, because although it has a lot lesser pixels per inch of display, it also counts with a lot larger display and a better 2200 x 2480px resolution.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a lot better camera than Galaxy S6, because it has a way more mega-pixels back facing camera, a way higher 7680x4320 video resolution, a larger aperture for better captures in low-light situations and a lot bigger sensor which gives a way better image and video quality. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a superior memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy S6, because it has 512 GB internal storage capacity.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a much better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy S6, because it has a 5700mAh battery size instead of 2550mAh.
Despite of being the best phone in this comparison, the Samsung Galaxy S6 is also a bargain compared to others.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.