Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.3 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 5.1 | -- |
| 2015-08-13 | 2017-11-03 |
| 6.08 x 2.98 x 0.27 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.40 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Gray | Silver and Space gray |
| Glass; metal | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 439.00 | $ 1149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 8.46 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.8 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 336 hours standby time 28 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone X is much better than the Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+, getting an 88.1 score against 79.3. Apple iPhone X's design is way newer, but heavier and just a little thicker than the Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+. Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+ counts with a little bit better looking screen than Apple iPhone X, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a little higher resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels and a little bit greater pixel amount per display inch.
IPhone X has a much greater storage for games and applications than Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has 256 GB internal memory. IPhone X features a much greater hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a greater number of cores and a 64-bit processor.
The Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+ features just a bit longer battery lifetime than Apple iPhone X, because it has 3000mAh of battery capacity. IPhone X captures clearer pictures and videos than Galaxy S6 edge+, because although it has a lot less mega pixels resolution back facing camera, a lower 3840x2160 video definition and a tinier sensor capturing worse quality videos and photos, it also counts with a bigger diafragm aperture to take better photography in poorly lited environments.
Although Apple iPhone X is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+. So if you want that extra features and specs, you can buy the Apple iPhone X, but if you don't you can save a couple dollars and buy the Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+, giving up some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.