Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.3 | 82 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 5.1 | -- |
| 2015-08-13 | 2018-10-26 |
| 6.08 x 2.98 x 0.27 inches | 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.40 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Gray | Black, Blue, Red, Rose gold, White and Yellow |
| Glass; metal | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 439.00 | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1792 x 828 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 515 pixels per inch | 324 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 8.46 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.8 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 2942mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 336 hours standby time 28 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone XR is a little bit better than Galaxy S6 edge+, with a general score of 82 against 79.3. The iPhone XR design is newer, but notably heavier and thicker than the Galaxy S6 edge+. The Galaxy S6 edge+ counts with a more vivid screen than iPhone XR, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a much higher quantity of pixels per inch of screen and a way higher resolution of 2560 x 1440px.
IPhone XR and Galaxy S6 edge+ both count with extremely similar memory capacity for applications and games, they have exactly the same internal memory. IPhone XR has an extremely better CPU than Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+, because although it has less RAM memory, it also counts with more cores and a 64-bit processor.
Apple iPhone XR features a slightly better camera than Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+, because although it has a much less mega-pixels back facing camera and a lower (4K) video quality, it also counts with a bigger back camera sensor taking higher quality videos and photographs and a bigger diafragm aperture to take better low light images.
The iPhone XR has a battery duration that's just as good as the Galaxy S6 edge+ one, although the iPhone XR has just 2942mAh of battery size instead of 3000mAh.
Although iPhone XR is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Galaxy S6 edge+, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Galaxy S6 edge+. So if you want that extra features and specs, you can buy the iPhone XR, but if you don't you can save a couple dollars and get the Galaxy S6 edge+, letting go a couple specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.